> The ideas of the cyberchor are getting clearer for me now. - sorry Rainer
> that this produces more trouble. I know part of your postilion is to bring
> us "back" to some reality and things that CAN be realisized.
everything can be realized, it's just a matter of time and money :)
to be serious: Currently I'm reading the RealAudio docs; there's still a lot
to read, but I think that this software has more useful features than I
originally expected.
> >1. web audience can push some buttons...
[...]
> hm I like this idea - interactivity as in a RL stage (because no RL
> audience knows how interactive they are :)
> Rainer?
well, from a technician's point of view, it doesn't matter if the user input
comes from a button or from http protocol data (if it is made available).
The only thing that hast to provided (from someone who cares) is some kind
of "translation table": which action leads to what ?
> > i'd suggest a cocktail of noises (nature noises: sea roars and whispers,
> >rain, birds; city noises: cars, avenues, men at work, etc; computer noises:
> >printers, booting sounds, disks, etc), texts (from the odyssey: in greek
> >and other languages; from joyce's 'ulysses'; from other related works), and
> >'musical' sounds (notes and phrases by different instruments: lyre,
> >aborigin -didjeridoo, siku, bata, etc.-, classic -violin, piano, etc.- and
> >modern -synth, electric guitars, electroacoustic).
well, personally I maintain two positions regarding this project: the position
of a technician and the position of a rather conservative audience. from the
first one I'd like to say that I don't see any problems in realizing this
"sound library" (I don't know how to implement this yet, but I'll figure
it out).