This is just a short answer, the longer one will be following.
It will have more explanations and arguments.
All opinions mentioned are copyrighted by me and
should be thrown back at me and nobdy else.
> Your plan is fabulous,
Jim, I don't like your plan for Freiburg at all.
> and is just like what I have come to expect from
> you, big thinking, great groundwork, VISION! :-)
Jim, I think you just simply show to all again
that VISONS are fun to have but that you have no
idea on what it takes to realize such "visions"
>
> Keep it up.
I guess then I will have to unsubscribe from the
idea-list
> We now have hardly any time for the Freiburg proposal. I
> think your idea about miracles of low bandwidth (can't remember exactly
> now) is exceptional, perfect, just what this crowd will get excited about.
> We focus on MOO, on it's ability as a distributed learning environment
That sounds more reasonable.
> accessible to all (well, almost all) and use this larger project you have
> envisioned as the example.
>
> Now, m'dear, you need to reign in the larger plan and direct your
> attention specifically to Freiburg, and to the proposal! Lead us there,
> you know where we need to go!
>
Now m'dear,
a) The Freiburg conf. seems not to be focusing on theater
and nothing with the general idea of Oudeis
(as far as my limited knowledge about it alows to judge)
It is a conference about HCI (human computer interaction)
which is a very broad general term for everything.
What does it have to do *specifically* with Oudeis
except that Oudeis uses this technology in order
to realize its own idea: a world wide performance?
I just don't see the connection.
b) you have no clue what you want at Freiburg
c) therefore it follows you have no idea on where
"we" (whatever that is) need to go.
> Oudeis-ers....we have to act and act fast. Deadline for Freiburg
> approaches. Besides Jim and Santi, I haven't seen any response to
> postings about this important, dual-organization, international event.
> Oudeis MUST be represented!
>
Why?
For me this is dead unless concrete concepts appear.
Sorry for the harsh phrasing but you will understand
from reading the following mail for which I will take
some time to write it.
A coming together as Monika put it is nice of course
but setting something up which will work and which
will have to work is something completely different.
And it is way out when nobody really knows what should
be set up.
Soooo... maybe I misunderstood everything and therefore
got so upset, maybe it is a good idea after all but
the mere phrasing was wrong. But I don't thinks so
given what I know presently.
Oudeis, in my opinion, ought to have one subgoal at the
moment: how to achieve a status where our project
becomes something professional which is to be
respected. So we have to work professionally.
cu,
Leon Aaron Kaplan,
aka "mr. TCP/IP"