>I guess some people like to have dictators and some people don't. It is
>everybodies choice under which condition she/he want's to work.
This is getting ridiculous.
Everybody who wants some structure is for dictators ???
How do you think a project which needs hardware, money and ressources works ?
Everything is great. We need no decisions. Everything is equal.
Is this a rebirth of 60ies group dynamic fantasy?
>In the mid 60ies, in Britain, a new form of theater came up, called
>alternative, experimental or fringe theater. It's functioning was based
>on collective work.
>example: living theater
Ok the whole world is a big theater. Life is theater.
Internet is a theater.
Collective work does not mean that it is not organized.
>A VERY good example. There has been some discussion between you and me
>and net.lab and there has been some decisions between us! (actually I
>never really questioned it)
What are the decisions ????? A lot of discussions in this list show that
there are absolutely no decisions because there are endless recursions.
>You have the ability to NOT accept decisions if they do not go along with
>your initial concern.
I accept every decision. But there are none...
>How do you know that the Internet is not the right tool (I know it is
>never synchronous etc)? but have you ever tried?
It is not a question of trial. It is a question of concept.
>relating to Andrew Garton's theater about "public space" : we DON'T want
>to "create another tool"/space, we want to use a (more or less) public space
I read discussions about java laetely ! So what ?
The public space is already there nothing needs to be done.
>Theater is not about creating space it is about transforming space
I think this century is not about space it is about time.
>Ideas can not be judged.
If ideas are not judged they are pretty worthless.
regards, L.Zyka
parallel(task);
Praterstr. 49/13
A-1020 Vienna
Tel+Fax: +43-1-216 32 09